The Custodia Bank lawsuit against Federal Reserve has reached a critical point: Summary Judgement.

avatar
(Edited)

Important News

  • Custodia Bank has asked for summary judgement in its lawsuit against the United States Federal Reserve, a legal move sometimes indicating that the evidence it published during the earliest part of its lawsuit is so compelling that a trial is not needed.
  • Custodia Bank Founder and CEO is Caitlin Long, a Harvard Law School graduate , and banker with 22 years of banking experience working for Credit Suisse, Morgan Stanley and Mellon Bank, and has owned bitcoin since 2012] is leading the bank during this fight,
  • Custodia Bank is a rare breed of bank called a a Special Purpose Depository Entity, which acts simply as the custodian of your deposited money, doesn't engage in loaning your deposits or investing your deposits, and makes its money from customers only through fees.
  • This means that unlike practically every other bank, which makes money on loans and investments of customers deposits, a non-lending banks customers funds are never at risk.
  • 2023 was a year when several large banks went out of business due to their loans, and linvestments, and lost millions of dollars of customers funds. Rational people would think the fiunding aof a non-klending bank in such a climate would be met positively by Federal Banking Regulators.
  • And in fact the bank claims that initial reviews by the Federal Reserve Bank were stellar.
  • But when the news leaked that Custodia Bank planned to also custody bitcoin, like it custodied money, thus providing it's customers with the same secure way to hold their bitcoin as their cash, it is reported that it's former friends turned to enemies.
  • It's its Federal Reserve Master Account application, a crucial piece in its journey towards financial viability was turned down, with the ironic statement that the bank could not be financially viable. i
  • Bankers are polite people, who do not rock the boat, and never sue the Federal Reserve Bank, but Custodia Bank CEO Caitlin Long chose not to go quietly into the night to die. But instead she and her bank turned to fight.
  • Ironically, several other custody banks, whose Federal Master Accounts were rejected have also decided to not go quietly into the night, and as if inspired, they are suing the Federal Reserve also.
  • This is a historical event in Federal Reserve Banking history in the United States, as younger generation people, with 20 plus years experience in the banking system are trying to change the rules and create bridges or meeting points between the traditional banking system and the blockchain.
  • Caitlin Long's very own words are that she wants to build a regulated, compliant bridge between cryptocurrency and the modern banking system, with a intense focus on regulatory compliance and safety.
  • This should have been a time when the regulators rolled up their sleeves to work hand in hand with industry, as they should sghare the same goal.
  • But it appears that something else got in the way of rational and logical thought.
  • So instead of being a shining regulatory light, leading the banking industry into the light of progress and innovation, the Federal Reserve instead appears to have chosen to be dragged screaming and kicking into the future.
  • Sad...
  • Read more below.
    @shortsegments

Jan 17, 2024 -

Custodia Bank presents "Exhibit BS" in its lawsuit against the Fed

By Crystal Kim, author and creator of Axios Crypto Newsletter

A court battle between a novel bank that wants to do business in crypto and the Federal Reserve Board is coming to a head.
Zoom in: The central question in this case is whether a politically motivated Fed intervened in a process conducted by one of the reserve banks it oversees, wrongfully denying Custodia Bank a Fed master account.
The big picture: One major unresolved question that reared its head in 2023 relates to Operation Choke Point 2.0.
Crypto is arguing that it is being unfairly shut out from key services like banking, whereas bank regulators have justified their arm's-length stance, citing systemic risk.
A win for Custodia may not be a broader win for crypto, but could open the door for other banks that want to do business with the industry.
Catch up fast: The bank first sued in June 2022, saying the Kansas City Fed had taken months to decide on its master account application, though the process was supposed to take days.
Now, Custodia is arguing that it was held to different standards and subject to Kafkaesque bureaucratic processes, described as "a ploy to derail Custodia's master account application."
In December it filed for summary judgment, publishing evidence surfaced through discovery that would appear to prove that point.
Read the rest of the article here: Source

It's author is Crystal Kim, and she is a New York-based crypto reporter for Axios and author of the Axios Crypto newsletter.

Write her here: email. [email protected]
Source

Posted Using InLeo Alpha

Posted Using InLeo Alpha



0
0
0.000
5 comments
avatar

Custodia Bank Account, the self-custody wallet alternative for Bitcoiners

Introduction: The self custody alternative for cash/fiat and bitcoin

  • I think an account at this bank can serve as an alternative to keeping all your dollars as stablecoins and self- custodying your Bitcoin in your own wallet.
  • Custodia Bank is a US Bank in the state of Wyoming.
  • Wyoming has passed many cryptocurrency friendly laws over the past couple of years, such as declaring bitcoin property.

Body

  • One such law established the these rules for Custodia Bank
    • A Custody Bank doesn't lend the depositors money nor invest it. A Custody Bank just custodies the depositors funds, and Wyoming law states that these fubds are not assets belonging to the Bank, and are not liable to seizure in the event of a bankruptcy. This is important because in the bankruptcies of three major banks last year, depositors with large depositors found themselves no longer classified as depositors, but investors, and their funds could be seized and used by the courts to pay the creditors of the banks which failed. This historical occurrence severely undermined consumer confidence in banks and led to flight of customers from small banks, to large banks, perceived as. to big to fail.
  • Next Custodia Bank applied for and was granted a license to custody Bitcoin for customers also. This is a very timely event because of the ever growing number of investors interested in putting small amounts of Bitcoin in their investment portfolio. But they must learn to self custody it or keep it on an exchange, and with the large number of cryptocurrency exchange failures in 2023 that is not an attractive option. So being able to trust a bank to custody your bitcoin is the natural thing to do in traditional finance society, so Custodias move is a brilliant one.
    depositors of regular banks are insured by FDIC

Summary

  • I think the structure of Custodia Bank as a business which provides regular banking servbices like checking accounts and savings accounts, but specifically doesn't make money loaning out or investing your money, is inherently safer for depositors to protect them from bad loans or bad investments a regular bank may make.
  • Plus the law in Wyoming speifiying that customer deposits are not bank assets and must be returned immediately to the customers in an event of bank failure is further reassuring.
  • Lastly, Custodias smart move to apply for a Bitcoin custody license further sets it aprt from the competition by providing a place for investors who are not knowledgeable enough to safely self custody their Bitcoin a safe place to hold it as a longterm or short term investment.
  • I think this makes Custodia Accounts ultimate self custody wallet since the bank by law must return all your deposits to you on demand.

Last Words

  • What do you think?
  • Do you want to open an account with Custodia Bank?
  • Let me know in the comments?
  • I also wonder if Custodia will next partner with Coinbase or some other cryptocurrency exchange so Custodia can become a one stop shop, where customers can buy cryptocurrency and store it in their bank account.
0
0
0.000
avatar

This is an interesting development, so this bank has been building itself while we were all sleeping.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Followup: from this source: https://x.com/MetaLawMan/status/1752722655881441651?s=20
All a quote:
It’s not just the SEC.

The Federal Reserve leads the Operation Chokepoint 2.0 crackdown on crypto.

Custodia Bank
@custodiabank
has sued the Fed because it failed to approved Custodia's application for a Fed "master account."

A Fed "master account" is essentially a bank account for banks, allowing banks to use the Fed system for check clearing, wire transfers and ACH payments.

Federal law requires the Fed to grant a master account to any federal or state chartered depository institution.

Custodia is a Wyoming chartered depository institution.

It usually takes 5-7 business days for the Fed to approve a master account.

Custodia waited with no response from the Fed to its master account application for 20 months.
So, Custodia was left with no option but to sue the Fed.

The Fed then denied Custodia’s application for a master account 8 months after the lawsuit was filed.
(Yes, this does sound exactly like how the SEC treated
@Coinbase
's petition for rulemaking.)

Custodia has turned up some fascinating details in the discovery it has conducted against the Kansas City Fed and the main Fed in DC.

A tangled web indeed:
In connection with Custodia's application for a master account, the Kansas City Fed conducted a comprehensive examination of Custodia and submitted its Report of findings to the main Fed in DC.

What happened with that Report tells you all you need to know about how our government is treating crypto.

Capital
After a comprehensive investigation, the Kansas City Fed's Report concluded that Custodia’s capital was “adequate.”
Without any additional investigation, the Fed in DC changed the Report to say there was a “lack of a robust capital requirement framework” at Custodia.

Risk Management
The Kansas City Fed concluded that Custodia had “strong risk management” practices.
The Fed in DC changed the Report to say there were “significant risk management gaps.”

Liquidity
The Kansas City Fed concluded that “liquidity risk was relatively low” at Custodia.
This makes sense because, unlike banks that use a "fractional reserve" business model to lend out deposits, Custodia uses a "fully reserved" model--meaning it retains liquid reserves covering over 100% of the deposits it takes in.
Notwithstanding its hyper-conservative liquidity model, the Fed in DC changed the Report to say there were “insufficient liquidity risk management processes” at Custodia.

Management Experience
The Kansas City Fed concluded that the experience of Custodia's management team was “impressive” and “extensive.”
The Fed in DC changed the Report to say there was a “lack of collective depth of relevant banking experience” at Custodia.

The Report, “revised” by the Fed in DC to say the opposite of what the Kansas City Fed had concluded, was used as the basis for denying Custodia's application for a master account.

It is obvious from the documents uncovered in discovery that the process was rigged because the Fed objected to Custodia’s plan to provide banking and digital asset services to individuals and businesses involved in crypto.

To their credit, the
@BlockchainAssn
and the Attorney General of Wyoming filed amicus briefs in support of Custodia's recent motion for summary judgment.

Fighting the Fed is the quintessential David v. Goliath battle.

Fortunately, Caitlyn Long
@CaitlinLong_
the CEO of Custodia, is a fighter.

But Caitlin is not just fighting for Custodia,
she is fighting for all of crypto and the principle of financial freedom.

0
0
0.000